> On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 22:45 -0700, Sanjay wrote: > > Am into development of a high-traffic site using > > TG+SQLAlchemy+Postgres. > > > > Curious to know as details as possible on what this posts means to me, > > and what are the suggestions. While I started my journey three months > > back, had thought for Django as well, but chose Turbogears due to some > > technical superiority. > > > > thanks > > sanjay
FrozenBear have developed Diggdot.com and other sites that prove that you can scale TurboGears sites to high traffic. Opirus and rPath Linux are also using TurboGears in production with good success. If there's a relocatable test which causes TurboGears to fail under such a low load, I'm sure it can and will be fixed quickly. Unfortunately I'm tied up for the next little bit, but if you guys can produce a failing test, we'll be able to move from there to a fix. And if failing tests aren't reproducible, it's likely to be an issue with the original tester's setup. And given that I've seen higher load than this, and I know people who have quite a bit higher load, I think it's possible that the test is either unrealistic in some way, or that there's a configuration problem on the server being tested. --Mark Ramm --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
