John, I personally have tested FCKeditor within a tg app. It is very simple to integrate because is it a javascript only include. I extended the widget class and created a template the used the proper <script> tags and it shows up. Then you wrap it in a html form and the output from the editor gets posted just like any other form value.
I think an approach like this is great for a CMS where the content managers are not tech savvy but can cut and paste from word for example. The problem I ran into right away is the kid templating strict xml parsing. Using that editor, if you delete stuff, it will leave tags dangling, etc. So you would have to include as part of the form validation the same kind of xml parsing that kid uses to prevent kid from choking on submit. It think it would be a great addition to the stock tg widgets. The xml validation seems to be the only tricky part. John Henry wrote: > I assume there are zillion of WYSIWYG HTML/XHTML Web content editors > out there but do I care if any of them are TurboGear aware? > > If so, how's your experience with them? Particularly the open source > freeware type? > > Regards, > > > > Regards, Aaron --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
