On 11/2/06, Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Tim Lesher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Would anyone object to a patch to implement this? > > Having a fallback (the current behavior) for "non-optimized" OSs and then > having this optimization would be nice... But, again, it will only solve > things for development and probably only if you use just a few external tools. > > Having a good perfomance on production is more worth spending time than saving > seconds of development... (Yes, I understand that in 300 restarts it can save > you 5 minutes... :-P) >
I dunno about that. As long as production performance is good enough, I'd rather just get the development done faster. I could spend all that extra time optimizing when I actually need to! Development speed and ease of use is also very important to "selling" TurboGears. -bob --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
