On 11/3/06, percious <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok, so does this create a "pw" field in the database then? That's not > backwards compatible.
Not really. > Also, I'm not sure how well this is going to > work on active mapper, but perhaps I'll give it the good 'ol US of A > try. :) []s core --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
