On 11/8/06, iain duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 22:55 -0500, Karl Guertin wrote: > > On 11/7/06, iain duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is Catwalk expected to later support SA or will it in effect be replaced > > > by the functionality of fast data? > > > > The theory is that the functionality will be replaced. This area is in flux. > > > > > Sorry for all the pestery questions, I'm trying really hard not to start > > > this project off on the wrong foot! Can't really figure out right now if > > > I should just stick to SO or dive in to SA. > > > > SO gives you more terse model syntax and catwalk. SA handles the hard > > cases better. > > Could anyone give examples ( perhaps these could be saved for docs ) of > where they feel the switch point is in terms of db cases? IE specific > instances of what you might need to be doing to justify the extra > overhead of SA? > Ask and you shall receive http://docs.turbogears.org/1.0/RoughDocs/SQLObjectVrSQLAlchemy
I hacked this up as a guideline so people can build it up :) > Thanks > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
