On 11/10/06, Ilias Lazaridis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The technical facts are very clear. > > TurboGears is essentially a toy as long as is cannot rely on a > industry-standard-compliant (at least a subset) persistency-layer. > > I hope that the project-lead will realize this, despite the desperate > attemps of the community (essentially the overall python community) to > say "everything is fine".
Sorry, I haven't drunk that particular Kool Aid. To call TurboGears (using something like SQLAlchemy) a toy is just foolishness. Large numbers of folks create all kinds of applications in Java using straight JDBC, or using Hibernate. Lots of people create apps all day long in PHP talking directly to MySQL (without transactions, even!) This is open source. If someone wants to go and implement an "industry standard" (that I'd bet is used in a tiny minority of webapps), go for it. If it looks like a better solution, I'd be happy to use it. Personally, I'd rather spend my time making cool and useful stuff. Kevin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
