On Nov 21, 2006, at 1:06 AM, iain duncan wrote: > >> By the way, for those handful of people who were wary of the LGPL: if >> you use tgsetup with the --future option, that eliminates the one >> piece of LGPLed code in use by TG. The LGPL really shouldn't a >> concern, but I know that it's come up a couple of times. > > Is there any reason for the lgpl to be a concern? It gets used for > csound, and as far as I remember you can even embed lgpl in non-gpl > apps > that are sold commercially as long you keep the lgpl code under > it's own > license, correct?
Note that I don't have a problem with the LGPL, but I have heard from people whose lawyers don't like the wording and find terms like "linking" ambiguous for dynamic languages. Personally, I think the Mozilla license is a better approach to the same problem because it would be hard to interpret incorrectly. Kevin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
