Hi Chris, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm curious if CherryPy has any competitors or alternatives?
That's difficult to answer, since each product in this space has varying degrees of overlap with competitors. The closest thing I can think of to CherryPy is actually Apache. > I noticed Pylons uses something called Routes. Is that an alternative? Routes is an alternative to one facet of CherryPy: the default dispatch style. CherryPy's default dispatcher works on a tree of objects, and Routes (a dispatcher) works on a more explicit set of controllers and connections. Note that CherryPy 3 includes a Routes-style dispatcher in cherrypy.dispatch. > CherryPy works so nice I'm not sure why Pylons didn't/can't use CherryPy. > Maybe they can? That's a long answer with a lot of history. ;) The short answer is that Pylons chose Routes for dispatching (by default), and Paste for deployment and config. CherryPy provides its own solutions for those facets in a single package. Robert Brewer System Architect Amor Ministries [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
