Igor Foox wrote:
> Or you could search the web for the inevitably existent comparisons: > http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=turbogears > +django&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8 Unfortunately, last I looked, most of the comparisons were out of date. For some reason there was a frenzy of blog postings about a year ago which has since subsided, so you see a lot of comparisons of TG 0.8.x to other frameworks. I've not used Django, but I have spent time reading what other people have to say about the two, and my impression is the Django is a quality framework which is very strong in the area of content management. If you have a site with various contributors and need them to be able to add and manage the content, Django may be exactly what you need. TurboGears is, I believe a more generalized framework that lends itself to a wider array of Web/Intranet apps. It can do content management, and I imagine Django can do things that are *not* content management. But, for example, with Django doing content management, you get the actual management UI for free, whereas you would have to write it under TG. "Try them both" is probably good advice, but as I hardly ever do any CM, I just cut right to TG. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
