Ilias Lazaridis wrote: > Ο/Η Diez B. Roggisch έγραψε: > > If all it takes to make a good post is to remind people that more/better > > documentation is needed, I just set up a daily reminder post and become > > poster-of-the-week for the next year or so. Because that is true for > > nearly every project alive, FOSS or commercial. And even though his > > current demands are relatively concrete, they still are only demands, > > but he doesn't compile the information he wants in a wikipage himself > > (which is what wikis are for), but just complains about them missing. > > Nothing special. > > It's like any other enhancement request from any other user. > > Otherwise, ticket systems would remain empty. > > I've filed the issue: > > http://trac.turbogears.org/turbogears/ticket/1210 > > and naturally, this _cannot_ lead to a comment like "hey, troll, why > don't you provide the docu yourself"?
Actually, considering one of your stated goals here is to evaluate TurboGears, and you seem to have the same goal for at least Django, I think you are in a relatively unique position to provide insight (and thus, documentation) on the matter. Obviously I am not expecting you to be able to provide a detailed description of the goals for the TurboGears project, but describing it in relation to other frameworks is much easier for someone who has evaluated many of them. -Adam --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
