On 1/7/07, Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps a change in philosophy going forward will assist in keeping the documentation complete. Documentation is not something that is done after code has been accepted it should be considered a part of the code just like the BSD's do, missing or incomplete documentation is considered a bug.
That wouldn't be a change in philosophy. That would be more like "sticking to what we have already claimed the project philosophy is".
From http://www.turbogears.org/about/philosophy.html
"If it isn't documented, it doesn't exist is a good rule of thumb. This is not to say that patches will not be accepted without documentation: send the patches in, by all means! If the feature is good and valuable, someone will document it. However, until the feature is documented, it will not be listed as a feature of TurboGears." -- Tim Lesher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
