On Tue, 2007-09-01 at 10:30 +0100, Christopher Arndt wrote: > gasolin schrieb: > > > > I think it's a good point to be well discussed in the incoming doc > > sprint, > > and produce some solid guide about the discussion result. > > > > It's time to do something for this situation. > > Well, this is a bit of a scrape we're in here: > > - on one hand people are complaining that some of the existing features of TG > 1.0 are not properly documented yet and request that we concentrate our > efforts > on smoothing out what we have now. > > - on the other hand people are complaining that they can't use all the new and > shiny features yet, because they are not properly documented. > > I think we should listen only to the the first bunch for the moment.
+1 from me on that. ( As I have already indicated in my rantings, ha ha ) We need to get a usable solid system that can be *relied* on to behave exactly as it is documented and work all the time in production scenarios. Feature creep is a great way to prevent this from happening. Iain --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
