> It would > certainly be interesting to see more cooperation between the two, e.g. > if the TG admin tools were WSGI based then it could be interchangeable > just like the Buffet template plugins that both frameworks use now.
This is the direction we are headed, towards decoupling tools from the core, using more WSGI, releasing separate libraries, and generally becoming easier for Pylons to steal from. (And hopefully vice-versa!. People always ask me when TurboGears and Django are going to merge or at least start sharing more code -- and I tell them that we're just too philosophically different so that's a harder than it looks. But the Pylons folks are just as interested in code re-use, WSGI, and all of that good stuff. So I would hope, and expect, that we have a lot of fertile collaboration with Ben and friends in the future. I'm sure that Alberto would agree, since he seems to be a happy user of both frameworks. ;) -- Mark Ramm-Christensen email: mark at compoundthinking dot com blog: www.compoundthinking.com/blog --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
