On Jan 29, 11:51 pm, Christoph Zwerschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard Clark wrote:
> > You have compared a bunch of high level web development frameworks,
> > whose express purpose is to make development of complex web
> > applications simple, by comparing their most basic performance metrics
> > as if they were HTTP servers.
>
> Exactly. You cannot make any really meaningful statements if you only
> look at static "Hello Word" examples. Neither about execution time nor
> about development time (as done in Joel Spolsky's nevertheless
> interesting screencasthttp://oodt.jpl.nasa.gov/better-web-app.mov).
Although it is now out of date (and does TG a huge disservice at this
point in time), that comparison is still worlds more useful than this
one in that it focuses on the right subject. Performance is (largely)
a solvable problem for web apps. Making web development easier is
still something that we are all exploring. Since that, and not raw
speed, is the focus of every platform on the list above, I would
advise anyone still looking for their solution to weigh out how their
chosen framework will help them get their app written, chances are
that you will have more tools than you need to handle performance when/
if it becomes an issue.
-Adam
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
