> Now it's your opinion that SO needs more docs I'll suggest to contribute at > their documentation instead of complaining to either TG or SO. if you don't > think your qualified to do so, then write something even a blog post that > could be the base for a better contribution.
Just to be clear, I'm not complaining. I was trying to answer the original question: "I'd like to hear the specifics of what you think needs attention in the TurboGears Documentation." I gave my opinion, and an example of what I think good documentation looks like. Your responses have been a little surprising - you started by telling me that I could find everything I needed on 3 pages which I don't find helpful. When I pointed out that not everything I needed was on those pages you told me that I was doing things wrong, and then you suggested *I* should write the documentation. I've been trying to use turbogears on and off for 6 weeks. I'm not in a position to write much by way of documentation. Especially if I really am doing things wrong (which may be the case). Would you really want me to mislead others? Anyway, I'm sorry if I sounded like I was complaining. I was really only trying to be helpful - explaining where I found the docs lacking. I thought that's what the original poster wanted. I would never have posted my reply if I thought all of this was going to happen. Sorry to have offended anyone.... Tamara --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
