Hi, Sam,

Listen, you're doing some very interesting work. The message behind
your development comes across as clearly experimental and not to be
reviewed in terms of usability (yet*wink*). I think you're onto
something. Please, stay the course and continue to share your findings
and examples. Per the previous post by ian duncan, he's spot on in
terms of marketability. Do you have some example code posted somewhere
or that you'd be willing to share?

Go a step further and provide some visual feedback to your audience
(e.g. pre-loader). It makes a world of difference rather than looking
at a gray box for some indeterminate amount of time. This could be
accompanied with a small explanatory tag denoting your intent/
inspiration. It probably won't make the 'nay-sayers' love a particular
technology any more but they might come to appreciate the approach
you've provided.

I hope this message encourages you to keep it up.

Jes

PS Me, I'm a Front-end engineer specializing in Flash/Flex
development.

On Feb 27, 7:54 am, "SamFeltus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I found if you put all your changable sets in the DB, hooked TG to an
> MXMLC compiler, have the Kid template spit out  ActionScript, and
> created/edited the SWF in CatWalk, it just worked.
>
> I am tinkering with the SWF having an edit mode right now, but it is
> primitive.  Just a button press (Cricket Compiler) to recompile the
> page, drag the images around to reposition, editing the text in the
> page.  I am gonna try and add a Flex based control panel next.
>
> I think it would be potent if attached to a better library of
> ActionScript than I know how to write.
>
> One thing, creating/editing the page in the browser, it is irritating
> not having an image editor for the browser, and having to drop out of
> a web based environment to edit images for the web.
>
> On Feb 27, 2:58 am, iain duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2007-26-02 at 09:42 -0800, SamFeltus wrote:
> > > I am sorry I posted it...
>
> > > My apologies...
>
> > No need, people buy flash websites all the time. I don't know about the
> > others here, but when I'm selling stuff I listen to what my client
> > wants. ;)
>
> > I don't really like *most* flash sites myself. But I sure as heck intend
> > to figure out combining TG with actionscript because I can guarantee it
> > will be marketable.
>
> > Iain


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to