[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hmm. All right, I guess I'll accept that logic. But given how > the other validators effectively do round trip conversion, I found > it counter intuitive. Nor would it be intuitive to have False > rendered as '' as a string. Sometimes, I don't want to use > checkboxes.
You don't need to. There's the other validator. And you can declare that when a field isn't sent it should assume some default value (False in your case). > Maybe it's a bug in Python :) :) :) If you think so, post it there and propose some changes. -- Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
