I'm not saying we make it something you have to use.. I'm just saying we need to make the install easier.. not everyone is going to have 10 years experience. I mean some people just want to toy around with TG with a registered domain name.
Maybe just a better guide outlining the most common deployment path.. How do you deploy your apps? -Ian On 4/26/07, Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Ian Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I just want to say that I agree it is a problem. Considering TG is a > > framework that's supposed to be easing the developement process by > > choosing the best of the breed... it definately stops as soon as you > > try to deploy it. Ha like.. where do I put the config file.. I had > > the same problem.. and then after that.. how do i get it to start on > > start up.. write an init script? well yeah I CAN but then.. what if I > > have two.. write 2 init scripts? I like the workingenv and > > supervisord setup mentioned earlier on the list but why can't we kind > > of standardize this? I mean yeah yeah.. everyone has their own needs > > but most of us are going to upload our TG project and proxy it behind > > apache...and then try to figure out how to start it or even where we > > put the config file. So I guess my whole post is to say don't ignore > > the problem .. because it is a problem. > > I don't see why this can't be an external thing. What I mean is: why > bloat TG's dependencies? Why can't we have different "products" that > help deploying apps? > > I know it isn't easy for everyone. And it varies with your experience > with Apache and the OS you're deploying into, but I don't think it is as > bad as you are saying... But I'm using computers for almost 20 years > and I'm exclusively on Linux for almost 10 years, so I admit I have a > biased view. > > On the other hand, I don't want to install supervisor or whatever if I'm > not going to use it (and I won't...). If it becomes a dependency on TG, > I'll have to bloat my installations with things that don't have any real > use to me and I'll have to add that to specs, validation tests, certify > those installed versions, etc. > > So, I'm +1 for a product / package that helps that. But I'm -1 to have > that on TG's core. > > -- > Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
