The back ends of some applications need a lot of compute power that shared/virtual hosts won't let you have, so $70/month could be cheaper than dedicated servers. (Imagine you're YouTube.) I have several compute-intensive programs that use my TG model, but have nothing to do with the website per se.
On Jun 5, 7:19 pm, Christopher Arndt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > TGTry schrieb: > > > Has anyone heard of any progress in implementing Turbogears on the > > Amazon EC2 web service? > > What's the point of using Amazon EC2 for a web application? If I > understandhttp://www.amazon.com/gp/browse.html?node=201590011 > correctly, you get charged $ 0.10 per hour that your instance (i.e. > virtual host) is running. Plus the traffic. A web server has to run > 24/365, so you get: > > $ 0.10 * 24 * ~365.25 / 12 = $ 73.05 per month. > > You can rent around 4-5 virtual hosts sufficient for TurboGears for this > money. Including probably more traffic than you need. > > Or am I not getting something? > > Chris --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
