> Sorry, but I don't see how python is relevant here. What is relevant > is the threading model of tg/cherrypy regardless of which language is > used to implement it but maybe I'm misunderstanding you.
Well, threading isn't a concern here - but process management. And it seems that unfortunately my answer wasn't correct. On the python command line, things work as expected: >>> import subprocess >>> po = subprocess.Popen(["sleep", "50"]) >>> sys.exit() [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ps ux ... 1000 14685 0.0 0.0 2716 600 pts/14 S 18:04 0:00 sleep 50 But under cherrypy/a TG app, I wasn't able to do the same. I could successfully start a subprocess, but not terminate the TG app without terminating the child process - which is bad of course, or better to say not what you wanted... So I think whatever cherrypy does (and it's cherrypy here, TG itself doesn't add to that AFAIK), you have to circumvene it the same way you did for apache I presume. sorry for causing confusion. But maybe I can figure out a way how to make things work. Diez --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
