On Oct 24, 1:23 am, Barry Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >unpleasant, for 2 reasons: firstly, because of the unintuitive backref > >stuff which seemed to allow a reference to be accidentally declared > >twice under different names, and secondly because it specifies the > > I have learned you always want to declare the relationship on the parent > object of a relationship.
And what about situations where there is no parent? :) I suppose I could just put it on the one that came first in the alphabetical order...! A lot of my objects aren't in some sort of composition hierarchy but are actually just loosely associated, and that can make it a bit awkward to decide where to put the links. Oh well, it's not insurmountable. -- Ben Sizer --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
