On Nov 23, 2007 11:14 AM, iain duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> Whether to use SO or SA really depends on how complex your database > needs are. I'd suggest searching the list archives, lots of good posts > on the topic. Yep. SO is quite a good ORM and we have core developpers using exclusively SO. > SA is very powerful, but definitely more work at the outset. It is also > a bit of a moving target these days, but the docs are superb and SA 0.4 > has some really nice features. You will need to read a lot more online > to get SA 0.4 working though as it is not compatible with many of the > beginner tg tutorials. If you want to use SA 0.4 you will need to use TurboGears 1.0.4b2, since SA 0.4 introduced some changes in the final version that we fixed in this release. > If you decide to use SA, I'd recommend starting with 0.3 installed in a > virtual env for isolation and work through Lee McFadden's excellent > tutorials ( the Splee Blog series ) I am not sure here. Maybe 0.3 could be interesting, but 0.4 final is well documented and supported since TG 1.0.4b2 (beta versions of SA were supported before that). I would tend to say that since you chose SA in the first place you are not afraid of complexity and are after power and flexibility. In that case _I_ would go for 0.4.0 final (I did not test 0.4.1 yet). But this is just a personal feeling, not an authoritative answer. Fellow TGers? Regards, Florent. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
