On Fri, 2007-23-11 at 23:20 -0800, Graham Dumpleton wrote: > On Nov 24, 8:07 am, iain duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-23-11 at 21:58 +0100, remi jolin wrote: > > > le 23.11.2007 17:06 Lukasz Szybalski a écrit: > > > > Hello, > > > > I am using turbogears in production server using mod_proxy which means > > > > the turbogears app needs to be up and working. > > > > > > Is there a way to start it or make sure its up automatically?? > > > > Does anybody have this implemented and working??? > > > > > I use supervisor2 to start and "maintain up" my TG servers. > > >http://www.plope.com/software/supervisor2/ > > > Fits my need :-) > > > > +1 on that. I finally got around to checking it out a couple of weeks > > ago and it's an awesome little utility. > > > > You can even write super easy functional bot tests with twill off it > > supervisord to really make sure everything is happy! > > If using Apache just to run mod_proxy, you could avoid the whole issue > by simply using mod_wsgi (http://www.modwsgi.org). This is because > Apache/mod_wsgi acts as the supervisor system for you and as long as > Apache is started when the system is started, as it usually would be, > you don't have to do anything special, just the normal configuration > of mod_wsgi to get it to host TurboGears. :-)
Hey Graham, you seem pretty up on this stuff. Is this now viable for less than expert sysadmins? I remember I looked into it last year and heard two many warnings about possible issues doing the apache + mod_wsgi + cherrypy root for someone like me ( a muddling along reading tutorials type sysadmin ). Also, would that help cut down on constant ram use as compared to apache + mod_proxy to cherrypy or would that now make any difference? For whatever reason, even under low loads, my apache threads start off with reasonable ram use, and then a few days later they have ballooned up to eat all the ram again. I was going to switch to nginx, but now I'm not so sure as it looks like apache is pretty handy to use with SVN and trac. I would love to hear more about this configuration. This is definitely something that would be welcomed on the site recipes. Thanks Iain! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
