On Fri, 2007-28-12 at 21:19 -0800, Graham Dumpleton wrote: > iain duncan wrote: > > I have read the docs on mod_wsgi and it seems really cool ( thanks > > Graham! ) but I'm wondering if others who know more about servers could > > comment on what the pros and cons are of using mod_wsgi compared to > > running cherrypy in a separate process and using mod_proxy. > > A few things to start the conversation. Most interested still in > others comments though. There are a few people going around telling > fibs about mod_wsgi in an attempt to discredit it, so if you have > heard negative points about it would love to hear them so can either > set the record straight, or at least understand why people think it > may not be suitable in certain contexts so it might be improved > further if necessary.
Thanks Graham. I admire that you don't want to get into the mudslinging, but could you possibly let us know what these misconceptions are? If I'm googling and am a hack of a sys-admin ( true ) then I'm unlikely to know which ones to take with a grain of salt or not. What is the status on getting mod_wsgi accepted into common apache bundles? Seems like it would be a great thing to have available instead of fast_cgi. And can you comment on any cons of mod_wsgi? ( knowing of course that you are biased. ) Iain --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
