On Jan 22, 2008 12:53 PM, Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> > How do we want to proceed? First create a stable TG 1.1 version again in > > the 1.1 branch, and then create a new 1.2 branch for switching to > > CheerryPy 3, or should we already work on CherryPy 3 in the current TG > > 1.1 branch? How big would the change be, what does it entail? > > I prefer your proposal. With as much cleanup as we can get without really > moving to CP3 as possible. Then, 1.2 would require CP 3 to run. I have been doing cleanup and maintenance on the 1.0 branch for some time now. We need an evolution of the config system to tear it out of CP2 (thus moving to CP3). This is becoming quite crucial now and will not wait for an hypothetical 1.2 release. I will gladly accept any contribution to the code... Many contributors have now moved on to the 2.0 effort, which is a good sign, those who stay on the 1.x branches will have to be motivated by what they do. Florent. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
