Marco Mariani schrieb: > Diez B. Roggisch wrote: > >>> I was expecting the default mochikit file from the TG distribution not >>> be included in the resulting web pages, but it is. I don't see any >>> changes related to the suppress flag. Where should I be able to see >>> the change if the flag is on or off? >>> >> That's strange. It should work, I use it myself. I wont be able to look into >> it for a couple of days, but if you can put together a small test-app that >> exposes the behaviour I will look into it. >> > > Same here, I provided a CVS MochiKit release via tg.include_widgets and > wanted to disable 1.3.1. > > I dare to suggest that MochiKitLink.retrieve_javascript() is not even > called, at least in my case (tried a breakpoint), although RemoteForm > still brings up the old MochiKit.js
Ok, I checked it - and for whatever wicked reason, the suppression really didn't work. I don't have the slightest idea why - there was a unit-test for it, and I used the code myself. But what can I say? It didn't work. So if you could apply the attached patch to your installation of TG 1.0.4 & check if things work out for you, I'll apply it to the 1.0 trunk and will beg Florent to make a new release.. :) Diez --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
