On Jul 9, 1:55 am, Christopher Arndt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, the examples are correct. As you have noticed, the URLs given there > explicitely name the index method. In this case the index method acts > like any normal method with a non-special name. Your URLs did not name > the index method.
Ah yes, I see it now, thanks. I suppose I was relying on the 'special' behaviour of the index method to carry through to the parameters, but obviously it doesn't, which is fair enough. The docs could do with a sentence or two about this however. -- Ben Sizer --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
