On Thu, 2008-10-07 at 10:52 -0400, Dean Landolt wrote: > I've been following the development of TG2 for quite a while now and > it sounds like it's starting to stabilize. There are already some > production apps on top of it if that means anything. That said, for > what you're describing: SA, Genshi and TW, the differences between the > two should be negligable. The real differences show up in the web > server implementation and url dispatching and the like... > > As for AJAX, flexible url design can make that a lot easier (TG2 wins > hands down), but otherwise this is client-side activity and should be > independent of the web framework you've chosen -- it should have more > to do w/ your choice of javascript libraries (though some frameworks > -- I'm looking at you TG1 -- are less than agnostic about js library). > FWIW I've found jQuery to be infinitely more comprehensible than > MochiKit. My apps are all AJAX heavy and are built in TG1 w/ SA, > Genshi and TW, so my transition, when it does come, should be > straitforward.
I would pipe in that if you are using toscawidgets, sa, genshi, and jquery, and pushing all your domain logic into the model, the migration from tg1 to tg2 for the ajax stuff will be trivial. You can get it so that your controllers do almost nothing but: - fetch objects - stick them in widgets - update model objects with setattr() Iain --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
