On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 12:13, TGD101 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jorge- > > Thank you for your explanation. One that I can tolerate and > appreciate. > > You seem to be the most rational person in respects to my post. > > To be so nitpicky on a job assignment with an audience that works > withTurbogears is CRAZY. What SPAMMER would post a job assignment on > a board? What would they be advertising? How crazy. Failing to > contribute would be a wonderful assessment of my posts. Since I am > new here. But, SPAM? Please.
Schemia, please calm down... :) I strongly believe you are over exaggeration this issue. A mistake was made.. fine... Either by you (who could be more specific in the job description) or by Florent (who could have checked closely the message before flagged it as spam). But who never did a mistake ? And don't forget that Florent has _lots of credits_ in TG community... it isn't easy to be one of the main maintainers.... All this complaining will only make you look bad for people who could have any interest in helping you (even it that help is payed). You say you are new to the ML... fine with that... But before starting to yell how offended you are, you should try to search ML archives and see who is Florent Aide and what he has done to help TG project and community... It's like writing to python ML and start complaining about Tim Peters for something he did that you didn't approve.... > I like the list and received countless responses and actual help from > turbogear professionals, as I like the program myself. However, to > not email the person privately to discern if the person is indeed a > spammer - is an error in judgment. > > Sure, I will be more specific when I re-post it. And for that I > apologize. But the unnecessary cheerleading and mob thinking about a > spam post is funny to me. lol All this intense discussion doesn't seem funny to me, sorry... > This below text was the most appropriate response (yours) all other > opinions about 'pissed on' and etc will be ultimately ignored. : Well, probably mine will be ignored as well.... >> I'm sorry if our moderators passed your job offer as spam (also note that >> spam has become so broad that today it define to a lot of things, maybe a >> more proper term will be noise-in-the-channel), if it where me I wouldn't >> have let it pass, as it has close to zero information. Therefore I suggest >> that in the future you post a more detailed requirements list. One thing is >> for sure, since you send this second email you passed the Turing test >> (congrats). But do keep in mind that Florent does a great job at keeping our >> inboxes clean and from time to time some messages fail his heuristic tests. I agree with Jorge here... if Toscawidget's ML (which I am one of the managers trying to get it spam-free) has a couple of spams a day, what to say about TG's mailing group ? Of course there are lot's of spammers making our lives not so easy as it could be. Best regards, Roger --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
