On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 14:59 -0700, Daniel Fetchinson wrote: > >>> > I certainly wouldn't mind an RC2 for the time being though > >>> > personally ;) > >>> > >>> +1 > >>> > >> > >> same here. > > > > Same here. ;) > > > > I'm going to cut back on the release expectations and make something > > happen in the next couple of days. Apparently through some mistake > > that we (probably I) made last week when fixing things up after some > > website issues, the current index actually lets you download 2.0 > > release now, but it has not been announced and the website has not > > been updated. > > > > I'll do those two things, and probably create a 2.0.1 release this > > weekend with a couple of minor bug fixes, which would have gone into > > 2.0 if it hadn't already gotten into the wild ;) > > I'd suggest against releasing an incomplete 2.0 release even if it is > already out in the wild. If it wasn't announced it doesn't exist :) > Otherwise people will be using the not completely finished 2.0 release > and will start complaining "Finally a 2.0 tg release! I've been > waiting forever! ........ Oh, it's buggy! After so long! Tg is crap!". > And this wouldn't be good for publicity. There are many people who are > waiting for a final 2.0 release that they expect to be accompanied by > at least the second coming of JC so I'd say if there is an official > 2.0 release it'd better be really tested and as complete as possible > otherwise tons of people, the real believers, will be disappointed.
+1 on that. 2.0 brings a lot of expectations and first impressions are impossible to dispel. iain --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
