That's more than acceptable. You can also include the MIT license directly if you want.
That's has always been the case and it's just a matter of us not having copied the right files over when we moved things around in the repository. On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli<[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jul 6, 4:30 pm, Florent Aide <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli<[email protected]> wrote: >> > If yes, can you please add aLICENSE.txt to the root of that >> > repository clearing stating so? >> Good question. :) We'll clarify this point ASAP. > > Hi, ping on this. > Any news? > > Looking a bit better in the SVN of the docs, it looks like a "quick > and easy" solution would be to state in the root README.txt that also > the doc is covered by the TG2 license, pointing to main/License.rst > for more info (if it is the case, of course). > > TIA, > Cheers. > > > -- Mark Ramm-Christensen email: mark at compoundthinking dot com blog: www.compoundthinking.com/blog --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
