On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Christopher Arndt <[email protected]>wrote:
> > Ken Kuhlman schrieb: > > I haven't tried it, but it looks like you should be able to just add an > > "identity.require" line to your config sections. > > I thought I knew the identity framework in TG1 pretty well but I never > noticed this functionality. Amazing! I don't think this is documented > anywhere in the official docs. I'm opening a ticket now... > > > See: > > The SecureObject class in turbogears.identity.conditions > > http://trac.turbogears.org/changeset/552 > > http://nerd.metrocat.org/2006/01/refining-the-identity-framework > > Wow, where did you dig up that article?! Almost from the prehistoric age > of TurboGears ;) Interestingly, Jeff seems to claim that SecureObject > should protect a whole controller tree too, not only SecureResource. If > that is so, it sheds a new light on #2207. > > > Chris > > I knew it would be a good question since it was from Daniel, so I went digging. I saw the reference to an identity.require config setting in turbogears.identity.conditions right away but couldn't find any docs so I went googling. After reading a related thread, where Kevin Horn asked about moving identity predicates from controller code to config [1], I was able to narrow the search down to postings from Jeff Watkins. That led me to his blog. If those days weren't prehistoric, they were at least the wild west. :-) Thanks, -Ken [1] http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/31840a7cbdfac119 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
