On 3 Nov., 05:25, Ken Kuhlman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Daniel Fetchinson <[email protected] > Once that's fixed, someone (probably me) needs to propose goals for the > release. When we have consensus on that, we can start putting out alpha > releases.
I met with Christoph Zwerschke the day before yesterday and we talked a bit about what we think should go into a TG 1.5 release. I agree, that there shouldn't be too many new features, but there are some issues, which we already planend for the TG 1.1 release, but nobody found the time to do and I'd like to adress at least some of them for TG 1.5. I don't have my notes with me now, but I'll try write up our plans tonight and publish them here. We initially intended to dicuss this with Ken and the TG2 developers internally first, but I think it's no harm doing this openly. > What I personally took away from the survey was a desire to keep the 1.5 > release small, so I intend to focus on documentation almost exclusively once > the blockers are closed. On the other hand, I don't see much sense in keeping a TG 1 branch if it doesn't evolve. That would be no fun to work on and without some fun, nothing gets done. Chris --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
