On Aug 16, 5:01 pm, "Phillip J. Eby" <[email protected]> wrote: > I can stick always_overrides back in if this is going to be a > widespread problem, but at some point it's got to go. > > If it helps, I could push ahead on supporting inline priority() in > rules... ;-) > > (See > http://dirtsimple.org/2010/08/simplifying-prioritized-methods-in-peak.html > for details.)
I went ahead and pushed out a new snapshot (r2672) with both a fix and the new priority() feature. Sorry again about the mixup. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en.
