Guys!
There are two extremely important thing to get/be popular!
I am a biologist doing some computational work, too. Sometimes we need
some GUI and (I think) the easiest is to have a web application. We need
fast and easy development. I prefer python even in websolutions over
java or php.
However, my problem with most of the python frameworks (not only with
web-frameworks) that they are not "stable". I do not know the right word
for the thing I want to say. I do not mean that it crashes. I mean that
there are no "interfaces" and therefore you can not simply update your
project, you have to put significant effort to rewrite the code.
I think the popularity would increase if
1. there were some strict rules, interface-like things defined for (TG;
framework-code) developers
2. there were some better (and more) documentations (better working
tutorials, accurate user guides and library references) - however I also
would not put energy in a detailed documentation if the code changes often.
Best regards,
Tamas
Mengu wrote:
no bernd, TG is dead*. long live pyramid_turbogears!
* TG is merging with Pyramid so it will be very different from what it
is now.
On Jan 16, 4:13 pm, bvdb <[email protected]> wrote:
With a bit of experience in organization I'm always cautious to push
the blame to one aspect alone.
One crucial question might be:
Do TG developers really want the framework to become _popular_ (not
only efficient, powerful or elegant)?
/ Bernd
--
Tamas Hegedus, PhD
Membrane Research Group | phone: (36) 1-459 1500/60233
Hungarian Academy of Sciences | fax: (36) 1-266 6656
Tuzolto utca 37-47 | mailto:[email protected]
Budapest, 1094, Hungary | http://www.hegelab.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en.
