Am 05.03.2011 17:31 schrieb Michael Pedersen:
We also need some place where we document the current status, responsibilites, release procedures etc. Particularly, I'm tired of answering questions about the status of the project on the mailing list every week. It would be so much easier to just refer to a wiki page. In TG1 we used the MoinMoin Wiki for that, maybe we can use the SF wiki for that.Frustratingly enough, that's the point of my weekly status emails. Maybe I should be posting that to both turbogears and turbogears-trunk? Doing so involves about an extra 10 keypresses. Would that help?
Maybe, but we will still need an *overview* page with all the info that users are permanently asking: What is the current state of TG1, 2, 3, which version is recommended, which is still maintained, where are the currently valid docs, downloads, repositories and bug trackers for all the branches, what are we currently working on, what are we planning for the future, who is responsible for what, where do we need help etc.
If you link to such a page in your status updates, you can keep them much shorter. In the long run, this info should all be on the project homepage, but I'm not sure if anybody is working on a new homepage (info and layout) and how long it will take.
-- Christoph -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en.

