For now, I've asked Ben Bangert if he can do a maintenance release, and
explained we have an open ticket we have to address. Hopefully, I'll hear
from him soon, and with a positive response.

We're definitely not ready for taking over Pylons ourselves, nor are we
ready to switch to Pyramid. There's enough differences between Pylons and
Pyramid that, without a compability layer, we'd have a lot of work ahead for
us.

On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 8:46 AM, julien tayon <[email protected]> wrote:

> pyramid is supposed to be the continuation of pylons. Does migration
> implies a lot of refactoring ?
>
> Plus pyramid have these gorgeous iron maiden like' T shirts.
>
>
> http://laflamme.storenvy.com/products/66831-pyramid-not-built-by-aliens-t-shirt
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TurboGears" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en.
>
>


-- 
Michael J. Pedersen
My IM IDs: Jabber/[email protected], AIM/pedermj022171
          Yahoo/pedermj2002, MSN/[email protected]
My Online Resume: http://www.icelus.org/
Twitter: pedersentg

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en.

Reply via email to