As I prefer xml based template engines I tend to Kajiki when I want fast templating and I usually end up using mako only for server side generated javascript.
I did some benchmarks a few months ago, but jinja wasn't included and I'm curious to see how it behaves kajiki compared to it. If you are able to port the benchmark to kajiki (should be quite fast to port the genshi one) I would really like to see how it compares to the others. On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Carlos Daniel Ruvalcaba Valenzuela <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi list, > > I put some time to do a few benchmarks on the different templating > systems that turbogears support and here are some preliminary results: > > http://blog.blackchairsoft.com/2012/03/21/turbogears-template-benchmark/ > > I benchmarked against 215 branch, mostly to compare Jinja against Mako > and Genshi (which hasn't been done), the results show, Jinja is on par > or faster than Mako on most tests, so that would be another good > excuse to use Jinja ;-) > > Regards, > Carlos Daniel Ruvalcaba Valenzuela > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TurboGears" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en.
