On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Christoph Zwerschke <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 25.06.2012 12:53, schrieb Alessandro Molina: > >> I think it is probably a tw2 bug as the right behavior is the one you >> get when you don't specify the id. The id of the root element should >> probably not be added to the field names. > > > As far as I understand that's considered a feature of TW2, not a bug (see > http://tw2core.readthedocs.org/en/latest/history/#consistency-in-ids-and-names) >
The id generation using colons is a feature, but the id of Form class should probably be skipped as far as I have been able to understand. The toscawidgets ML is a good place where to discuss this and find a stable solution. > By the way, is anybody working on a TW2 version of the forms tutorial > (http://turbogears.org/2.1/docs/main/ToscaWidgets/forms.html) already? If > not, I'm volunteering to do it. > Should have been already updated in new doc (http://turbogears-dev.readthedocs.org/en/latest/main/TwForms.html) if you find anything wrong feel free to change it, it has been created on TW2.0 and TW2.1 release might have changed something. > So the proper usage of TW2 is to pass a form class to the page template, not > a form instance: > This is another thing that we need to document properly, as it is not really > obvious. > Yep, the current TG2.2 form documentation already has examples that pass around the class itself. In TW2 you are expected to always use the class of the widgets wherever you used a widget instance before. The class itself has the display staticmethod and so on. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en.
