> > > You might want to give a try to a tasks queue like celery and see if you > have better results. > I'm also open to any patch to asyncjob, feel free to send them if you end > up implementing changes. >
Actually I was comparing to celery. I realized that could many of things with multiprocessing that I needed with celery. Basically it would be nice to start with threading or local processes and then move to remote processes if the need arises in production. Celery looks like a good solution, but takes more initial setup time and I not sure if its full capabilities are needed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/turbogears/-/iV6vsCcPfQ0J. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en.
