On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Craig Small <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is there some reason why installing the files as www-data was chosen? > I suppose it's just "not to be installed as root". www-data was probably a good tradeoff between a short documentation and safe deploy. The 2.3 deploy cookbook suggests now to make the application run as www-data but doesn't say anything about file ownership. The issue is that you would have to explain users to have separate owners for application files and process, which is probably out of the scope for a deploy tutorial. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
