Stand by.  I might have just been able to reproduce it using x11perf.

On 7/31/19 1:11 PM, Richard Ems wrote:
> Hi DRC,
>
> yes, I reproduced the leak while valgrind was running. I couldn't find
> any more output that a couple of lines saying valgrind had started on
> the log file.
> I can provide you with ssh access. Then you could start your own VNC
> and tunnel through ssh, would that be ok for you to test yourself?
> Or if you built Xvnc with LSan and can provide me with that binary
> then I could try to run it here.
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
>
> On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 at 13:34, DRC <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     So you reproduced the leak while valgrind was running?  If so,
>     then I don't understand why it didn't catch it.  The only other
>     idea I have is to try building Xvnc with LeakSanitizer (which is
>     in clang) and see if it can catch the leak in real time.
>
>     If I can actually see the leak and find out where it is in the
>     code, it's probably a one-line fix.  But without the ability to
>     reproduce it myself, I'm not sure what else to do.  If you can
>     provide remote access to a machine that reproduces the problem, as
>     well as reliable reproduction steps, I'm happy to look into it.
>
>     I will try building Xvnc with LSan on my end and see if I can spot
>     any problems using some test programs.
>
>
>     On 7/31/19 11:09 AM, Richard Ems wrote:
>>     Hi DRC,
>>
>>     I started Xvnc with valgrind --leak-check=full , but got no
>>     error/leak messages from valgrind in the log file.
>>
>>     I then contacted the starccm+ support, and they asked me to try
>>     to reproduce using TightVNC, which I probably should have tried
>>     first.
>>     I then installed the tigervnc-server package from RHEL7 and
>>     started that vncserver. I cannot reproduce the memory leak
>>     anymore on this Xvnc version.
>>
>>     So I am back to assuming that the issue is on the Xvnc version
>>     from TurboVNC   :)
>>     What do you think?
>>     Any proposals on what I can do next?
>>
>>     Many thanks,
>>     Richard
>>
>>
>>     On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 at 21:08, DRC <[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>         Since you can reproduce the problem, I would recommend
>>         running the Xvnc process with 'valgrind --leak-check=full'
>>         (the easiest way to do that is to modify
>>         /opt/TurboVNC/bin/vncserver.)  That should detect whether
>>         there are any leaks in Xvnc.  Your description suggests
>>         strongly that the issue is with StarCCM+, and if it goes away
>>         when that application is closed, then that would suggest more
>>         strongly that the application is to blame.  If it appears
>>         that valgrind is detecting something, then send me the output.
>>
>>         DRC
>>
>>         On 7/9/19 6:24 PM, Richard Ems wrote:
>>>         Hi DRC,
>>>
>>>         I've found a way to reproduce the memory leak now:
>>>
>>>         1. I start from scratch restarting the Xvnc session
>>>         2. then I start starccm+, load a simulation file and run it
>>>         for some iterations 
>>>         3. I stop the simulation, close the simulation BUT LEAVE
>>>         starccm+ OPEN, without any loaded simulation file
>>>         4. I monitor the Xvnc memory usage with "ps u `pidof` and
>>>         can see that the virtual memory size starts increasing about
>>>         10 secs after having closed the simulation, and doesn't seem
>>>         to stop as long as starccm+ is open (without any file loaded)
>>>
>>>         Does that help anyhow?
>>>         Very strange behaviour. 
>>>         I will try with other StarCCM+ versions.
>>>
>>>         Thanks,
>>>         Richard
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 at 17:44, DRC <[email protected]
>>>         <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>             OK, thanks.  You might get some traction by building
>>>             Xvnc using clang's AddressSanitizer and LeakSanitizer. 
>>>             Without a specific procedure to reproduce the problem,
>>>             there is unfortunately little I can do.  What I will do,
>>>             however, is double check the X.org commit log and see if
>>>             there are any leak-related patches that I need to
>>>             back-port into the TurboVNC Server.
>>>
>>>             libjpeg-turbo-official has never been necessary for our
>>>             run-time packages.  It is only necessary when building
>>>             VirtualGL or TurboVNC.
>>>
>>>
>>>             On 7/8/19 3:24 PM, Richard Ems wrote:
>>>>             Hi DRC,
>>>>
>>>>             thanks for your answer.
>>>>
>>>>             Good to know installing libjpeg-turbo-official is not
>>>>             needed. I removed it now. I think it was needed
>>>>             some time ago, or not?
>>>>
>>>>             Yes, this is reproducible with TurboVNC 2.2.1. We were
>>>>             seeing the high memory usage on TurboVNC 2.2.1 and
>>>>             that's why I updated to 2.2.2 hoping the issue would go
>>>>             away. But the issue seems to be the same on both
>>>>             versions, 2.2.1 and 2.2.2.
>>>>
>>>>             And no, I am not sure it can only be reproduced with
>>>>             StarCCM+ (yes, right "guess" ;-) ) . I did not try to
>>>>             reproduce it with other software. I even couldn't
>>>>             reproduce it with StarCCM+, but not sure what users do
>>>>             over the days to end up with this high mem usage.
>>>>
>>>>             Thanks for the explanations and for looking into it.
>>>>
>>>>             Cheers,
>>>>             Richard
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 at 17:01, DRC <[email protected]
>>>>             <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                 Unsure what is going on.  What I can tell you is that:
>>>>
>>>>                 - Yes, that memory usage is too high.
>>>>
>>>>                 - The problem is with TurboVNC, not VirtualGL.  If
>>>>                 it were a leak in VirtualGL, then the memory usage
>>>>                 would rise in the 3D application process, not in
>>>>                 the Xvnc process.  The memory leaks that I fixed in
>>>>                 VirtualGL 2.6.2 truly were minor-- like so minor
>>>>                 that they would have gone unnoticed unless you ran
>>>>                 VirtualGL through valgrind (which is how I detected
>>>>                 them.)  The leaks mostly took the form of memory
>>>>                 that was not properly freed at shutdown, so for the
>>>>                 most part, they didn't grow the memory usage of
>>>>                 VirtualGL while the 3D application was running.  I
>>>>                 fixed them primarily to make it easier to detect
>>>>                 more serious leaks, if they are introduced in the
>>>>                 future.
>>>>
>>>>                 Note that, if you are using the official VirtualGL
>>>>                 and TurboVNC packages, those packages statically
>>>>                 link with a specific version of libjpeg-turbo, so
>>>>                 installing libjpeg-turbo-official is unnecessary,
>>>>                 and the installed version of that package is not
>>>>                 relevant for diagnostic purposes.
>>>>
>>>>                 I checked the diff between TurboVNC 2.2.1 and 2.2.2
>>>>                 and didn't see any obvious areas of concern.  Some
>>>>                 follow-up questions:
>>>>
>>>>                 - Are you sure that this isn't reproducible with
>>>>                 TurboVNC 2.2.1?
>>>>
>>>>                 - Are you sure that it can only be reproduced with
>>>>                 one specific 3D application?  (StarCCM+, I'm guessing?)
>>>>
>>>>                 DRC
>>>>
>>>>                 On 7/5/19 9:36 AM, Richard Ems wrote:
>>>>>                 Hi all, hi DRC,
>>>>>
>>>>>                 DRC, thanks for your great work! TurboVNC +
>>>>>                 VirtualGL + libjpeg-turbo work great!
>>>>>
>>>>>                 But now we are seeing what looks like a memory
>>>>>                 leak in Xvnc.
>>>>>                 On a RHEL7.6 Workstation, we were
>>>>>                 using turbovnc-2.2.1, VirtualGL-2.6.1
>>>>>                 and libjpeg-turbo-official-2.0.2 up to one week ago.
>>>>>                 We were seeing Xvnc consuming lots of memory, so I
>>>>>                 checked and found "Fixed several minor memory
>>>>>                 leaks in the VirtualGL Faker." in the "Significant
>>>>>                 changes relative to 2.6.1" list for VirtualGL-2.6.2 .
>>>>>                 So I upgraded TurboVNC from 2.2.1 to 2.2.2 and
>>>>>                 VirtualGL from 2.6.1 to 2.6.2 and restarted all
>>>>>                 VNC sessions.
>>>>>
>>>>>                 The memory usage for Xvnc was low for some days,
>>>>>                 but now after one week running, one of the VNC
>>>>>                 sessions shows in "top"  601.4g virtual memory and
>>>>>                 127.9g resident memory in use.
>>>>>                 That seems to be to much, or not?
>>>>>
>>>>>                 In /etc/turbovncserver.conf I've set "$useVGL =
>>>>>                 1;" , may this be an issue? This setting has been
>>>>>                 there for months and we were not seeing this issue
>>>>>                 before.
>>>>>
>>>>>                 The Xvnc command line showed by "ps" is:
>>>>>
>>>>>                 # ps uw 364412
>>>>>                 USER        PID %CPU %MEM    VSZ   RSS TTY
>>>>>                      STAT START   TIME COMMAND
>>>>>                 <USER> 364412  1.1 25.4 632004096 134290304 ? Sl
>>>>>                   Jun27 133:52 /opt/TurboVNC/bin/Xvnc :20 -desktop
>>>>>                 TurboVNC: serv1.bartech.local:20 (<USER>) -httpd
>>>>>                 /opt/TurboVNC/bin//../j ava -auth
>>>>>                 /home/<USER>/.Xauthority -geometry 1240x900 -depth
>>>>>                 24 -rfbwait 120000 -rfbauth
>>>>>                 /home/<USER>/.vnc/passwd -x509cert
>>>>>                 /home/<USER>/.vnc/x509_cert.pem -x509key
>>>>>                 /home/<USER>/.vnc/x509_private.pem -rfbport 5920
>>>>>                 -fp catalogue:/etc/X11/fontpath.d -deferupdate 1
>>>>>                 -dridir /usr/lib64/dri -registrydir /usr/lib64/xorg
>>>>>
>>>>>                 This user is continuously running an application
>>>>>                 that gets started with "-clientldpreload
>>>>>                 libvglfaker.so" .
>>>>>
>>>>>                 What is going on here?
>>>>>
>>>>>                 Kind regards,
>>>>>                 Richard Ems
>>>>>
>>>>>                 -- 
>>>>>                 You received this message because you are
>>>>>                 subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboVNC User
>>>>>                 Discussion/Support" group.
>>>>>                 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
>>>>>                 emails from it, send an email to
>>>>>                 [email protected]
>>>>>                 <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>>>>                 To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>                 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/turbovnc-users/4b34a770-8cd1-42a0-ac55-a9cf492066ca%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>                 
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/turbovnc-users/4b34a770-8cd1-42a0-ac55-a9cf492066ca%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>>>>>                 For more options, visit
>>>>>                 https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>>                 -- 
>>>>                 You received this message because you are
>>>>                 subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboVNC User
>>>>                 Discussion/Support" group.
>>>>                 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
>>>>                 emails from it, send an email to
>>>>                 [email protected]
>>>>                 <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>>>                 To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>                 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/turbovnc-users/3661f75c-8163-3a21-d43b-8cd69c6500d2%40virtualgl.org
>>>>                 
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/turbovnc-users/3661f75c-8163-3a21-d43b-8cd69c6500d2%40virtualgl.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>>>>                 For more options, visit
>>>>                 https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>>             -- 
>>>>             You received this message because you are subscribed to
>>>>             the Google Groups "TurboVNC User Discussion/Support" group.
>>>>             To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
>>>>             emails from it, send an email to
>>>>             [email protected]
>>>>             <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>>>             To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>             
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/turbovnc-users/CAEqczzz6Ki3JR3H9Kt3so7%2Bn9LGN1-nwZt7M%3D32a4tuXyhP3aw%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>             
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/turbovnc-users/CAEqczzz6Ki3JR3H9Kt3so7%2Bn9LGN1-nwZt7M%3D32a4tuXyhP3aw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>>>>             For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>>             -- 
>>>             You received this message because you are subscribed to
>>>             the Google Groups "TurboVNC User Discussion/Support" group.
>>>             To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
>>>             from it, send an email to
>>>             [email protected]
>>>             <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>>             To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>             
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/turbovnc-users/8c71eefc-d3a5-d8b4-c9c7-af9fa270e80f%40virtualgl.org
>>>             
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/turbovnc-users/8c71eefc-d3a5-d8b4-c9c7-af9fa270e80f%40virtualgl.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>>>             For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>>         -- 
>>>         You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>         Google Groups "TurboVNC User Discussion/Support" group.
>>>         To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
>>>         from it, send an email to
>>>         [email protected]
>>>         <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>>         To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>         
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/turbovnc-users/CAEqczzyr3T9w%2B%2BLO7epLSkTdK4zcuX%2B_3nO%3D2%2B%3Dok9OsVZZaTQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>>         
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/turbovnc-users/CAEqczzyr3T9w%2B%2BLO7epLSkTdK4zcuX%2B_3nO%3D2%2B%3Dok9OsVZZaTQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>>>         For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>         -- 
>>         You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>         Google Groups "TurboVNC User Discussion/Support" group.
>>         To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
>>         it, send an email to
>>         [email protected]
>>         <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>         To view this discussion on the web visit
>>         
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/turbovnc-users/4729b454-3ed1-d297-e6f5-2f6556a410da%40virtualgl.org
>>         
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/turbovnc-users/4729b454-3ed1-d297-e6f5-2f6556a410da%40virtualgl.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>>         For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>     -- 
>>     You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>     Google Groups "TurboVNC User Discussion/Support" group.
>>     To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>     send an email to [email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>     To view this discussion on the web visit
>>     
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/turbovnc-users/CAEqczzzUhJs7PLd0pdBY%3Dy6jxgKK8bSsd1si3G5tywV9DiGpng%40mail.gmail.com
>>     
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/turbovnc-users/CAEqczzzUhJs7PLd0pdBY%3Dy6jxgKK8bSsd1si3G5tywV9DiGpng%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>
>     -- 
>     You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>     Groups "TurboVNC User Discussion/Support" group.
>     To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>     send an email to [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>.
>     To view this discussion on the web visit
>     
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/turbovnc-users/062afffc-78df-dc0d-5921-724f309b11bd%40virtualgl.org
>     
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/turbovnc-users/062afffc-78df-dc0d-5921-724f309b11bd%40virtualgl.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "TurboVNC User Discussion/Support" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/turbovnc-users/CAEqczzwrjcn0pe7xvwmBEd2PUXFfWtYve5ypHnbQFSfpoj%3Dw7A%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/turbovnc-users/CAEqczzwrjcn0pe7xvwmBEd2PUXFfWtYve5ypHnbQFSfpoj%3Dw7A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TurboVNC User Discussion/Support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/turbovnc-users/74709885-2ceb-0696-5782-9992f59d1e97%40virtualgl.org.

Reply via email to