Thanks ant, appreciate the offer and we will definitely take you up
on it. I'm just trying to get compilation and unit tests back up and
running. Once I do that today and tomorrow, I'll start the
discussion about the js container. BTW, it was really helpful having
that since it forces us to get the invocation stuff in an
implementation-neutral form.
Jim
On Feb 21, 2006, at 11:01 AM, ant elder wrote:
What ever is good for you, I'm just offering whatever help i can
give. If
you'd rather be left alone to get on with it that's fine, but if
there's
anything I can help with just say.
...ant
On 2/21/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a bunch of changes to the js container to support the proxying
infrastructure that is being put in place. Ant, would you want to
work together on this? I plan to check in once I get the compile and
unit test issues sorted out.
Jim
On Feb 21, 2006, at 4:17 AM, ant elder wrote:
On 2/21/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip>
These changes are breaking changes. I adjusted the code in the
core,
container.java and tomcat projects but binding.axis and
container.js do
not compile yet.
If its easier for you then feel free to leave the container.js
migration to
me. I'd wanted to do some refactoring to it anyway and this would
be a good
way for me to see what all these changes you guys are making are
about.
...ant
