On Jul 14, 2006, at 1:20 PM, Frank Budinsky wrote:
I hate to be a party pooper and, in fact, I can say that I've been too
busy with SDO issues to look at enough of the details to feel
qualified to
vote, but the most recent note I saw from Sebastien, voicing issues
with
Jeremy and Jim's design (that is what's called Chianti now -
right?), I
would have to say that some of them, at least the ones that I
understood
enough of the details of to form an opinion, sounded like important
concerns. So, I guess I'm just wondering how those issues are going
to be
addressed once this happens?
I think we need to look at all the issues going forward. Some will be
fairly easy to resolve - for example, although we might have argued
over how big a feature <include> is, we need it and some support for
it has now been included in the chianti code (pardon the pun). Others
may be harder to resolve and one challenge we have is to form
consensus out of those differences in opinion.
That is part of the decision here: we are saying that it is no longer
"Jeremy and Jim's design" but that we, as a community, are switching
and chianti will become our code.
--
Jeremy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
