I'll need to check but it will either be a) exception when adding the 2nd type of the same name... or b) 2nd Definition replaces first... or c) properties of 2nd definition are added to that of the first.
Or... none of the above! What do you think the correct behaviour should be? What would Java do? Cheers, On 07/08/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote: > In your example below the <complexType> is anonymous (does not specify > name=) therefore the SDO Type takes the name of the enclosing element. So > the SDO Type will have Uri=http://www.bigbank.com/AccountService and > Name=getAccountReportResponse > > Cheers, > > > On 05/08/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Most Web Services describe their inputs and outputs with XSD elements, >> so I'm trying to understand how to create an SDO DataObject for such a >> Web Service... (I'm using the BigBank scenario to experiment with that). >> >> Here's the XSD defining the output of my Web Service: >> <xsd:schema >> targetNamespace="http://www.bigbank.com/AccountService"; >> xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";> >> >> <xsd:element name="getAccountReportResponse"> >> <xsd:complexType> >> <xsd:sequence> >> <xsd:element name="checking" type="tns:CheckingAccount" >> maxOccurs="unbounded"/> >> <xsd:element name="savings" type="tns:SavingsAccount" >> maxOccurs="unbounded"/> >> <xsd:element name="stocks" type="tns:StockAccount" >> maxOccurs="unbounded"/> >> </xsd:sequence> >> </xsd:complexType> >> </xsd:element> >> >> </xsd:schema> >> >> How can I create a DataObject representing the getAccountReportResponse >> element using the SDO C++ API? Can DataFactory take an element name? >> Is there a method on XSDHelper or another helper that will give me the >> name of the type of the getAccountReportResponse element? >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> Jean-Sebastien >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > OK, that works, as per the SDO spec. What does the SDO runtime do if you have a complex type with the same name as an element containing an anonymous complex type? -- Jean-Sebastien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Pete
