I've already done the SDO one in 653. On 8/22/06, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Previous post by Jeremy is available here : http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg05128.html So, looks like we need to change the Notice.txt headers to : Apache Tuscany Copyright 2006 The Apache Software Foundation This product includes software developed at The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/). I'll take care of the ones for DAS and SDO at by creating and submitting a patch soon: java\distribution\das java\distribution\das-samples java\distribution\sdo I think people working on SCA should review their files, as I found couple different versions of the NOTICE.txt there, so I was afraid to touch it. - Luciano On 8/19/06, haleh mahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There was a posting few weeks pack stating that notice files have changed. > I > think Jeremy posted it. You can possibly search in the architve. > > On 8/18/06, Yang ZHONG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm finishing off the standalone distribution of SDO for Java, > > and beginning NOTICE.txt with the text from > > HTTP://WWW.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice< > > http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice>< > > http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice> > > At the same time, I notice SCA and DAS have the NOTICE files whose > > beginning > > is different from what I expect. > > I heard SCA and DAS had finished the distribution separation already, so > > is > > it just a overlook or actually tolerable? > > > > -- > > > > Yang ZHONG > > > > > > -- ----------------------------------------------------- Luciano Resende SOA Opensource - Apache Tuscany -----------------------------------------------------
-- Yang ZHONG
