1) I found the following section has been REMOVED recently from
http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
h3. Why isn't wiki.apache.org listed with the other approved services?
The Confluence wiki was set up in May 2006, and we still consider it a pilot
program. Once we are certain that the installation is reliable, and we are
sure that sufficient volunteers are available to maintain the installation,
it would be promoted to an approved service. Other new services, like
moin-moin, went through the samne "burn-in" phase. At this point, it's "so
far so good" for Confluence. Over a dozen projects have created spaces, and
we have several ASF Members able to help with the server-side
administration, like installing updated releases. Of course, most
administrative tasks can be handled by Project volunteers from within
Confluence itself."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It seems to me as a positive sign that CWIKI is now mature.
2) I'm not proposing to change the "edit" policy. The
http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/ page also provides some guidances for cases
that we use it as a sandbox (open to all registered users) or documentation
site (open to folks with CLA on file).
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeremy Boynes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 9:03 AM
Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
What was the resolution on the support question?
The old wiki is open to all registered users - why would we change that
policy?
--
Jeremy
On Jan 23, 2007, at 8:52 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi, Dan.
The CWIKI site was set up recently with default permissions. Only users
in the tuscany-committers group have "edit" access to the TUSCANY space
so far.
1) I'll let the community decide what the appropriate access control we
should have, please express your opinions.
Some seed questions:
a. What's the common practice set by ASF?
b. Should we open "edit" to committers or all of the registered users?
2) I can help update the ACL once we have a policy agreed.
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 2:47 AM
Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
Hi,
I see the CWIKI site is up (http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANY/) but not
open
for public editing... shame 'cos I was hoping to write some stuff about
getting started (I personally don't find the web site's getting started
guide that great so thought that I'd have a bash on the wiki... c'est
la
vie)
What's the plans now ? Is the CWiki only going to be open to tuscany
commiters - or anyone who is registered (as per existing wiki) ?
Cheers,
Dan
On 11/01/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
As the first step, I have filed a JIRA issue
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1107) to request to
create a
space for Tuscany on the CWIKI site. Once it's created, we can start
to
play
with it and then decide if we should move.
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
>I like the idead of a single (wiki based) site; it would be
better than
> having the current problem of overlap between wiki and website
- as per
> the
>
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
msg09447.htmlthread.
..
> If CXF have found it to work for them I think it would be a great
> plan
>
>
>
> On 06/01/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Jim Marino wrote:
>> >
>> > On Jan 5, 2007, at 6:08 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>> >
>> >> For quite a while the Confluence wiki was not maintained by
ASF
>> >> infrastructure - it was very much use at your own risk.
There may >> >> be
>> >> enough people using it now that that may have changed but
it would
be
>> >> worth finding out.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Jeremy
>> >>
>> >> On Jan 5, 2007, at 5:00 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> Tuscany wiki is currently hosted at
>> >>> http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany which is backed by
MoinMoinWiki.
I
>> >>> personally found it's not very productive to work this wiki.
>> >>> Recently I tried Confluence wiki and it seems to be more
attractive:
>> >>>
>> >>> * Better look and feel and you can even customize the schemes
>> >>> * Easier to use, for example, CWIKI supports "Rick Text"
editing >> >>> in
>> >>> addtion to "Wiki Markup"
>> >>> * Export to PDF/word/HTML
>> >>> * Comments
>> >>> * And more ...
>> >>>
>> >>> Apache has a CWIKI set up @ http://cwiki.apache.org/
confluence. >> >>> You
>> >>> can see more details at
>> >>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CWIKI/Index.
Quite a >> >>> few
>> >>> projects use it to maintain their web sites and
documentations.
>> >>>
>> >>> Should we request a space for Tuscany and migrate our
existing
>> >>> contents over? We can take this chance to better organize our
>> >>> materials.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>> Raymond
>> >>>
>> > I'd be in favor of this given Jeremy's point above. Perhaps
we could
>> > use CXF as a template to do this since it is very clean and
nicely
>> > organized?
>> >
>> > http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF/
>> >
>> > Jim
>> >
>> >
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On a related note the CXF approach resolves the constant dilemma
between
>> 'Project home page' and 'Wiki', as their home page is a Wiki!
It would
>> be worth asking them what they think about the approach
they've taken
>> and if they're happy with it and recommend it to others.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Sebastien
>>
>>
>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
