OK, I did that in update 529193 for the impl and 529191 for the API.
However, whilst the SDO M3 tag references the 2-incubating parent, it does not have incubating style versions itself. The upshot is that as it stands, when DAS or SCA want to create a tag with references to a non-SNAPSHOT SDO artifact they will have to switch from 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT to 1.0-incubator-M3. Is this sufficient reason to respin the release candidate? I can of course incorporate this change into a respin if it is required for other reasons. Regards, Kelvin. On 16/04/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote: > Hi All > > After couple complains about build failures, and couple hours > investigating the multiple complains on the dev-list [1][2], looks > like all the issues are being caused due to our artifacts having two > set of artifact versions : <version>2-incubating-SNAPSHOT</version> > and <version>2-incubator-SNAPSHOT</version>.After I changed everything > locally to use the same version as the one defined in the > java/pom/parent <version>2-incubating-SNAPSHOT</version>, the whole > build started to work and the issues reported are gone. > > So, in order to avoid future complains, I'd like to propose changes > to remaining artifacts that are using > <version>2-incubator-SNAPSHOT</version> version. Note that I have > already started changing the DAS artifact versions as described in > [3]. And I have attached a file containing the remaining places that > need changes. > > If people are OK with proposed changes, particularly the SDO team, > I'd like to go ahead and commit my local changes asap. > > [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg16509.html > [2] > http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-user%40ws.apache.org/msg00822.html > <http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-user%40ws.apache.org/msg00822.html> > [3] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg16625.html > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 from me. I think that the recommendation for artifacts from incubating projects is *-incubating-* (although I can't find the discussion thread right now I remember I had seen a discussion on this a while ago). The SCA artifacts are already *-incubating-*, looks like you're fixing the DAS artifacts, we need the folks working on SDO to say if they're OK with this change. -- Jean-Sebastien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
