On 5/10/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm just catching up with this thread.... and these comments are "shooting from the hip" as I haven't had time to look at the sample code in the distributions yet. I don't think samples should use JUnit. Samples should show how a user would build a (very simple) real application. Samples are not the same as tests. I don't see the need to have both class and jar executables for every sample. Perhaps there could be a mixture of these styles to show both options. I will look at the distribution contents and come back with a more considered opinion on this. Simon ant elder wrote: > On 5/10/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > <snip/> > > B.t.w the binary distro includes bigbank, das-service and loan-application > >> none of which are in the build currently. We should either fix them or >> remove them. > > > > Thanks, I've excluded those now. > > ...ant > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] As we have decided to forgo Junit this time round should I move the client
classes out of the /src/test and into /src/main? Clients only appear in /src/test in the three cases where we are showing how to build an extension (as building the client is not an intrinsic part of building the extension). However if the Junit tests, and hence the non-junit (but none the less test) client, are not included in the sample jars shipped with the distribution then the ant scripts won't work. Simon
