I agree that this refactoring is the right approach. I am happy to do this
if you like (and I promise to avoid camel-casing any package names :-)
Let me know if you are OK with this or if you would prefer to do it yourself.
Simon
Simon Laws wrote:
Looking at the databinding-echo sample I realize now that it is not showing
how to define a new databinding but using the sample echo binding to show
how the existing databindings work. However the source code from
binding-echo is duplicated here which is not great. I propose that instead
of refactoring this as per binding-echo and implementation-crud we
modify it
to remove the duplicated code and replace it with a dependency on the
binding-echo sample.
Simon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
